By Makutu Manneh
Saikou Sawo, the flagbearer of the People’s Progressive Party (PPP), has sharply criticized Dr. Ismaila Ceesay, Minister of Information, Media, and Broadcasting Services, describing him as a man lacking principles and consistency.
Sawo made the remarks in response to comments directed at him by Minister Ceesay during an appearance on the Kerr Fatou show. He stated that he has never met the minister and has no intention of engaging with him, arguing that Dr. Ceesay’s current role as a government spokesperson contradicts his earlier positions.
“So which Dr. Ceesay should we believe in? The one of today or five years ago?” Sawo questioned.
He noted that there are publicly available videos of Dr. Ceesay previously criticizing corruption and the Barrow administration, positions that he said the minister now appears to have abandoned.
According to Sawo, his focus remains on individuals of integrity who are committed to genuine change. He argued that Dr. Ceesay has not demonstrated such qualities, describing him as inconsistent and unworthy of engagement, adding that the minister does not contribute value to his vision or to the people he represents.
Addressing a question on whether Dr. Ceesay once inspired hope among young people before joining the government he had criticized, Sawo emphasized that his own entry into politics is driven by purpose rather than personal recognition.
He reflected on his background, noting that he grew up in The Gambia and understands the challenges posed by limited opportunities.
“After studying and building a career abroad, I returned home to invest and now want the same for all Gambians,” he said.
Sawo maintained that his integrity is non-negotiable, asserting that there is nothing President Adama Barrow could offer him to compromise his principles. He stressed that his achievements are the result of hard work, consistency, and determination rather than reliance on external support.
He concluded by describing Dr. Ceesay’s situation as unfortunate, stating that he does not believe the government could offer the minister anything beyond what he could have achieved independently.
Comments are closed.